Psyhological Response and Ntritional Status of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Mar 29, 2022
https://doi.org/10.20527/jdk.v10i1.21
Download
pdf
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Vol. 10 No. 1 (2022): Dunia keperawatan: Jurnal Keperawatan dan Kesehatan

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Rizki Andriani
STIKes Medika Seramoe Barat
Yulia Yulia
Fakultas Ilmu Keperawatan, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta
Riri Maria
Fakultas Ilmu Keperawatan, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta

Abstract

The application of nutrient guidelines into daily menu challenges the majority of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients as it needs time to change their dietary habit that has been previously formed. It is common for patients to experience boredom and stress due to their diet program that has to be implemented for the rest of their lives. Psychological response has a great influence in T2DM patients in their effort to control their diet. This research aims to analyze psychological response and nutritional status, also to observe their relationship in T2DM patients. This research uses cross sectional design. It is applied on three type A hospitals in Jakarta by consecutive sampling, with 260 type 2 diabetes mellitus patients as respondents. Questionnaire is used to collect the data. There is a significantly related between psychological response and nutritional status (p = 0.000, OR =4.944) that is not influenced by confounding variable such as anti-diabetic medication, food intake, and age. Respondents with diabetes distress psychological response have 4,944 times higher risk of experiencing abnormal nutritional status compared to respondents without diabetes distress. Regular meeting is needed at least once every four weeks to fulfill psychological needs concerning diabetes.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
1.
Andriani R, Yulia Y, Maria R. Psyhological Response and Ntritional Status of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients. jdk [Internet]. 2022 Mar. 29 [cited 2024 May 5];10(1):64-75. Available from: http://jdk.ulm.ac.id/index.php/jdk/article/view/21

References

  1. Alberti, S. G. (2002). The DAWN ( Diabetes Attitudes , Wishes and Needs ) Interim report on a global diabetes psychosocial research initiative, organised by Novo Nordisk in collaboration with the International Diabetes Federation and under the supervision of an expert intern. Pract Diab Int, 19(1), 22–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/pdi.305.
  2. Aljuaid, M.O , Almutairi, A. M, Assiri, M. A, Almalki, D. M, Alswat K. (2017). Diabetes-Related Distress Assessment among Type 2 Diabetes Patients. Journal of Diabetes Research. doi.org/10.1155/2018/7328128.
  3. Barker LA, Gout BS, Crowe TC. (2011). Hospital malnutrition: Prevalence, identification and impact on patients and the healthcare system. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 8(2), 514-527. https://doi:10.3390/ijerph8020514
  4. Bosi E, Scavini M, Ceriello A, Cucinotta D, Tiengo A, Marino R, Bonizzoni E, Giorgino F; PRISMA Study Group. Intensive structured self-monitoring of blood glucose and glycemic control in noninsulin-treated type 2 diabetes: the PRISMA randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2013 Oct;36(10):2887-94. doi: 10.2337/dc13-0092. Epub 2013 Jun 4. PMID: 23735724;
  5. Brewer‑Lowry AN, Arcury TA, Bell RA, Quandt SA. (2010). Differentiating approaches to diabetes self‑management of multi‑ethnic rural older adults at the extremes of glycemic control. Gerontologist, 50 (5), 657‑667. https://doi: 10.1093/geront/gnq001.
  6. Buchmann M, Wermeling M, Lucius-Hoene G, Himmel W. (2016). Experiences of food abstinence in patients with type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study. BMJ Journals, 6(1). https://doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008907
  7. Hughes, S. (2012). Diabetes: support for those at risk of malnutrition in the community. Br J Community Nurs. 17(11):529-30, 532-4. DOI10.12968/bjcn.2012.17.11.529
  8. International Diabetes Federation [IDF]. (2017). IDF Diabetes Atlas. Eight Edition. ISBN: 978-2-930229-87-4. http://www.diabetesatlas.org
  9. Krepia, V., et al. (2011). Diabetic patient’s compliance to the recommended treatment: A qualitative study in Greece. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 4 (3): 126-131
  10. National Centre Diabetes Risk Factor Collaboration [NCD-RisC]. (2016). Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: a pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4.4 million participants. Lancet 387:1513–30.
  11. Ouyang, C, Dwyer, J, Jacques, PF, Chuang, L.M, Haas, C.F, Weinger, K. (2015). Determinants of dietary self-care behaviours among Taiwanese patients with type 2 diabete. Asia Pacific Journal Clinic Nutrition, 4(3), 430-437. https://doi.org/10.6133/apjcn.2015.24.3.02.
  12. PERKENI (2015). Konsensus: pengelolaan dan pencegahan diabetes melitus tipe 2 di Indonesia. http://www.perkeni.org/
  13. Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Earles J, et al. (2005). Assessing psychosocial stress in diabetes. Diabetes Care, 28(3), 626-631.
  14. Ponzo, V., Rosato, R., Tarsia, E., Goitre, I., De Michieli, F., Fadda., M., et al. (2017). Self-reported adherence to diet and preferences towards type of meal plan in patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A cross-sectional study. Nutrition, Metabolism & Cardiovasculer Diseases, 27(7), 642-650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2017.05.007.
  15. Raj, G. D., Hashemi, Z., Soria, D. C., Babwik, S., Maxwell, D., Bell, R. C., & Chan, C. B. (2018). Adherence to Diabetes Dietary Guidelines Assessed Using a Validated Questionnaire Predicts Glucose Control in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes. Canadian Journal of Diabetes, 42(1), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2017.04.006.
  16. Rohimah, B., Sugiarto, Probandari, A., & Wiboworini, B. (2017). Perbedaan Kekuatan Genggam Berdasarkan Status Gizi pada Pasien DM Tipe 2. Indonesian Journal of Human Nutrition, 3(1), 48–58. Retrieved from www.ijhn.ub.ac.id
  17. Schmitt, A., Gahr, A., Hermanns, N., Kulzer, B., Huber, J., Haak, T (2013). The Diabetes Self Management Questionnare (DSMQ) : Development and Evaluation of an Instrument to Assess Diabetes Self care Activities Associated with Glicaemic Control. Health and quality of life outcomes, 11(138), https://doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-138
  18. Supariasa., et al. (2012). Penilaian status gizi. Jakarta: EGC
  19. Wardian, J & Sun, F. (2014). Factors Associated with Diabetes-related Distress: Implications for Diabetes Self-Management. Soc Work Health Care, 53(4): 364–381. https:// doi:10.1080/00981389.2014.884038.
  20. World Health Organization. (2016). Global report on Diabetes. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/diabetes/global-report/en/.