PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN STUDENT CENTERED LEARNING (SCL) DI FAKULTAS KEPERAWATAN UNIVERSITAS JEMBER

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Mar 20, 2023
Download
pdf
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Vol. 7 No. 2 (2019): Jurnal Dunia Keperawatan

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Ridlo Cahya Ilhami
Retno Purwandari
Alfid Tri Afandi

Abstract

Learning process in university must be conducted with the principle of Student Centered Learning (SCL). SCL
has several components that could influence the implementation of SCL. The purpose of this study was to
identify the implementation of SCL in Nursing Faculty of Jember University. This study used a descriptive
exploratory design with purposive sampling technique on 26 lecturers and stratified sampling techniques for 260
students. The results showed that the implementation of SCL to lecturers reached 81.7% (from a maximum value
of 33) and the implementation of SCL to students reached 80.19% (from a maximum of 36). This shows the
implementation of SCL in terms of students and lecturers having a good score. The lowest score for lecturers
was the class condition (68.4%) and the lowest value for students was the teaching material (71%). Lack of
facilities could have an impact on the disruption of the learning process using SCL so that students and lecturers
did not get maximum results. Institutions are expected to be able to renew their collection of books and class
conditions can be further optimized by reducing the number of students to 25 students in each class.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
1.
Ilhami RC, Purwandari R, Afandi AT. PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN STUDENT CENTERED LEARNING (SCL) DI FAKULTAS KEPERAWATAN UNIVERSITAS JEMBER. jdk [Internet]. 2023 Mar. 20 [cited 2024 May 9];7(2):106-17. Available from: https://jdk.ulm.ac.id/index.php/jdk/article/view/393

References

  1. Satya VE. Strategis strategi indonesia
  2. menghadapi industri 4.0. Kajian
  3. Singkat Terhadap Isu Aktual Dan
  4. Strategis. 2018; X(9):19–24.
  5. Hussin AA. Education 4.0 made
  6. simple: ideas for teaching.
  7. International Journal of Education and
  8. Literacy Studies. 2018;6(3):92.
  9. Faridi A, Bahri S, dan Nurmasitah S.
  10. The problems of applying student
  11. centered syllabus of english in
  12. vocational high schools in kendal
  13. regency. English Language Teaching.
  14. ;9(8):231–240.
  15. Gönc V, Lorber M, dan Nerat J.
  16. Experience of problem‐based learning
  17. for raising quality of nursing study.
  18. Teaching and Learning in Nursing.
  19. Aksit F, Niemi H, dan Nevgi A. Why
  20. is active learning so difficult to
  21. implement: the turkish case.
  22. Australian Journal of Teacher
  23. Education. 2016;41(4):94–109.
  24. Marinda AB. Hubungan Penerapan
  25. Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Student
  26. Centered Learning (SCL) Dengan
  27. Motivasi Mahasiswa Keperawaatan
  28. Program Studi Ilmu Keperawatan
  29. Universitas Jember [skripsi]. Jember:
  30. Fakultas Keperawatan Universitas
  31. Jember;2017.
  32. Asale, T.S. Factors affecting
  33. implementation of student centered
  34. method inmathematics classes : the
  35. case of otona secondary school grade
  36. , wolayta zone, snpr region.
  37. International Educational Scientific
  38. Research Journal. 2017;3(8):62-78.
  39. Kurniawan MA, Miftahillah A, dan
  40. Nasihah NM. Pembelajaran berbasis
  41. student-centered learning di
  42. perguruan tinggi: suatu tinjauan di
  43. Moh Heri dkk, Optimalisasi Program Preceptorship...
  44. UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta.
  45. Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan.
  46. ;21(1):1-11.
  47. Kurdi FN. Penerapan student-centered
  48. learning dari teacher-centered
  49. learning mata ajar ilmu kesehatan
  50. pada program studi penjaskes. Forum
  51. Kependidikan. 2009;28(2):108-113.
  52. Krishnan S. Student-centered learning
  53. in a first year undergraduate course.
  54. International Journal of Learning,
  55. Teaching and Educational Research.
  56. ;11(2):88–95.
  57. Ommar N. Perception of first and
  58. second year medical students on
  59. problem-based learning in universiti
  60. malaysia sarawak. World Applied
  61. Sciences Journal. 2011;14(11):1628–
  62. Ramadhani HS. Efektivitas metode
  63. pembelajaran scl (student centered
  64. learning) dan tcl (teacher centered
  65. learning) pada motivasi instrinsik &
  66. ekstrinsik mahasiswa psikologi untag
  67. surabaya angkatan tahun 2014 – 2015.
  68. Jurnal Psikologi Indonesia.
  69. ;6(2):66–74.
  70. Baeten M, Kyndt E, Struyven K, dan
  71. Dochy F. Using student-centred
  72. learning environments to stimulate
  73. deep approaches to learning: factors
  74. encouraging or discouraging their
  75. effectiveness. Educational Research
  76. Review. 2010;5(3):243–260.
  77. Ghasemi MR, Moonaghi HK, dan
  78. Heydari A. Student-related factors
  79. affecting academic engagement: a
  80. qualitative study exploring the
  81. experiences of iranian undergraduate
  82. nursing students. Electronic
  83. Physician. 2018;10(7):7078–7085.
  84. Al-Naggar RA dan Bobryshev YV.
  85. Acceptance of problem based learning
  86. among medical students. Journal of
  87. Community Medicine & Health
  88. Education. 2012;2(7):2–5.
  89. Handayani I, Birawa ABP, dan
  90. Lestari BW. Penerapan strategi
  91. pembelajaran student centered
  92. learning dan persepsi lingkungan
  93. belajar mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan
  94. Kesehatan. 2015;4(2):77–82.
  95. Wun, YT, Tse E, Lam TP, dan Lam
  96. C. Pbl curriculum improves medical
  97. students’ participation in small-group
  98. tutorials. Medical Teacher.
  99. ;29(6):198–203.
  100. Brush T dan Saye J. Implementation
  101. and evaluation of a student-centered
  102. learning unit: a case study.
  103. Educational Technology Research and
  104. Development. 2000;48(3):79–100.
  105. Lemos, AR, Sandars JE, Alves P, dan
  106. Costa MJ. The evaluation of studentcentredness of teaching and learning:
  107. a new mixed-methods approach.
  108. International Journal of Medical
  109. Education. 2014;5:157–164.
  110. Weimer M. Learner-Centered
  111. Teaching: Five Key Changes to
  112. Practice. Edisi 1. San Fransisco:
  113. Jossey Bass; 2002
  114. Barman, Jaafar AR, dan Ismail NM.
  115. Problem-based learning as perceived
  116. by dental. Malaysian Journal of
  117. Medical Science. 2006;13(1):63–67.
  118. Dunia Keperawatan, Volume 7, Nomor 2, September 2019: 106-117
  119. Harpe SE dan Phipps LB. Evaluating
  120. student perceptions of a learnercentered drug literature evaluation
  121. course. American Journal of
  122. Pharmaceutical Education. 2008;72(6)
  123. Secondira V, Rahayu GR, dan Suhoyo
  124. Y. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi
  125. mahasiswa fakultas kedokteran
  126. universitas gadjah mada untuk
  127. melaksanakan pembelajaran yang
  128. konstruktif, mandiri, kolaboratif dan
  129. kontekstual dalam problem-based
  130. learning. Jurnal Pendidikan
  131. Kedokteran Dan Profesi Kesehatan
  132. Indonesia. 2009;4(1):32–44.
  133. Wahyuningsih IS dan Santoso A.
  134. Pengalaman mahasiswa s1
  135. keperawatan dalam metode
  136. pembelajaran problem based learning.
  137. Konferensi Nasional PPNI Jawa
  138. Tengah 2013. 2013:95–100.
  139. Tekle G dan Fesshaye H.
  140. Investigating the challenges of student
  141. centered learning in higher education
  142. institutions in eritrea. African
  143. Research Journal of Education and
  144. Social Sciences. 2017;4(3):19–31.
  145. Johanes. Peran dosen pada
  146. pembelajaran student centered
  147. learning. Forum
  148. Ilmiah.2008;15(1):133–138.
  149. Housen D. Effective classroom
  150. management in student-centered
  151. classrooms. Education Masters.
  152. ;4:1–46.
  153. Osman SZM, Jamaludin R, dan
  154. Iranmanesh M. Student centered
  155. learning at usm : what lecturer and
  156. students think of this new approach ?
  157. Journal of Education and Practice.
  158. ;6(19):264–278.
  159. Altena S. Barriers to implementing
  160. student-centered learning [thesis].
  161. Brisbane: Queensland University of
  162. Technology;2018.
  163. Borda EJ, Boudreaux A, FacklerAdams B et al. Adapting a studentcentered chemistry curriculum to a
  164. large-enrollment context: Successes
  165. and Challenges. Journal of College
  166. Science Teaching. 2017;46(5):1 -8
  167. Alos SB, Caranto LC, dan Jose David
  168. JT. Factors affecting the academic
  169. performance of the student nurses of
  170. bsu. International Journal of Nursing
  171. Science. 2015;5(2):60–65.