Pelaksanaan Audit Mutu Pelayanan Keperawatan di RS A Jakarta Barat

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Mar 16, 2023
Download
pdf
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Vol. 8 No. 3 (2020): Dunia Keperawatan: Jurnal Keperawatan dan Kesehatan

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Vergeina Ayu
Hanny Handiyani
Aat Yatnikasari

Abstract

Implementation of quality improvement in hospitals is still unsatisfactory. One of the causes of this problem
is the inadequate implementation of nursing audits by the nursing committee. This study aims to identify the
implementation of the nursing profession audit at Hospital A, West Jakarta. The method used is a pilot study
in the nursing room with the involvement of manager nurses and clinical nurses as many as 140 nurses. The
analysis from the assessment stage, interviews, observation, distributing questionnaires and focus group
discussions, and fishbone analysis found that the nursing profession audit was the task of the nursing
subcommittee that was being improved. The implementation carried out is the latest creation, the auditor
team, audit tools and the implementation of nursing audits. Result: The audit was carried out by determining
the topic of handover between shifts. The not yet optimal implementation of handover between shifts is the
result of the nursing audit. The conclusion has been that the preparation of a new audit of nursing quality
has been carried out in RS A, the formation of an auditor team and the compilation of tools in implementing
nursing audits. The nursing profession quality audit has been carried out on the topic of handover between
shifts and the result is that the handover between shifts is optimized. Recommendations for the latest nursing
audits validation, conducting nursing audits on topics according to the needs of the nursing committee and
periodic re-audits. 

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
1.
Ayu V, Handiyani H, Yatnikasari A. Pelaksanaan Audit Mutu Pelayanan Keperawatan di RS A Jakarta Barat. jdk [Internet]. 2023 Mar. 16 [cited 2026 Oct. 2];8(3):397-405. Available from: https://jdk.ulm.ac.id/index.php/jdk/article/view/337

References

  1. Gishu T, Weldetsadik AY, Tekleab AM.
  2. Patients’ perception of quality of nursing
  3. care; A tertiary center experience from
  4. Ethiopia. BMC Nurs. 2019;18(1):1 –6.
  5. Edvardsson D, Watt E, Pearce F. Patient
  6. experiences of caring and personcentredness are associated with perceived
  7. nursing care quality. J Adv Nurs.
  8. ;73(1):217–27.
  9. McCalman J, Bainbridge R, Bailie R.
  10. Continuous quality improvement and
  11. comprehensive primary healthcare: a
  12. systems framework to improve service
  13. quality and health outcomes. Int J Integr
  14. Care. 2019;19(4):436.
  15. Somatunga L, Sridharan S, Refai M.
  16. Factors Influencing Continuous Quality
  17. Improvement Programme In Government
  18. Hospitals Of Sri Lanka. IjstrOrg
  19. [Internet]. 2015;4(6). Available from:
  20. http://www.ijstr.org/finalprint/june2015/F
  21. actors-InfluencingContinuous-QualityImprovementProgramme-In-GovernmentHospitalsOf-Sri-Lanka.pdf
  22. Pratiwi A, Hidayat AAA, Agustin R.
  23. mplementasi sistem manajemen mutu
  24. pelayanan keperawatan melalui
  25. kepemimpinan mutu kepala ruangan.
  26. Departemen of Nursing, Faculty of Health
  27. Science, Muhammadiyah University of
  28. Surabaya. 2015;1–10.
  29. Viana CD, Bragas LZT de, Lazzari DD,
  30. Garcia CTF, Moura GMSS de.
  31. Implementation of Concurrent Nursing
  32. Audit: an Experience Report. Texto
  33. Context - Enferm. 2016;25(1):1 –7.
  34. Romero B, Roche M anthony.
  35. Comparison between different D-Dimer
  36. cutoff values to assess the individual risk
  37. of recurrent venous thromboembolism:
  38. Analysis of results obtained in the
  39. DULCIS study. Int J Lab Hematol.
  40. ;38(1):42–9.
  41. Depkes. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan
  42. Nomor 49 Tahun 2013 Tentang Komite
  43. Keperawatan. Ber Negara Republik
  44. Indones. 2013;
  45. Kerr D, Klim S, Kelly AM, Mccann T.
  46. Impact of a modified nursing handover
  47. model for improving nursing care and
  48. documentation in the emergency
  49. department: A pre- and postimplementation study. Int J Nurs Pract.
  50. ;22(1):89–97.
  51. Trisnawati N, Wahyuni FS, Putri ZM,
  52. Keperawatan F, Andalas U, Padang K, et
  53. al. Pelaksanaan Audit Sistem Dalam
  54. Pencapaian Continous Quality Artikel
  55. Riwayat Artikel Abstrak The
  56. Implementation Of A System Audit And
  57. The Achievement Of Continuous Quality
  58. Improvement. 2019;11(2):103–10.
  59. Khairurrozi M, Zulfendri, Zahara S.
  60. engaruh Peran Komite Keperawatan
  61. Terhadap Peningkatan Profesionalisme
  62. Ayu V, Handiyani H, Yatnikasari A. Pelaksanaan Audit Mutu
  63. Tenaga Keperawatan Rumah Sakit Umum
  64. Daerah Aceh Tamiang. 2016; Available
  65. from:
  66. http://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/1234567
  67. /822
  68. Gifford W, Davies B, Rowan M, Egan M,
  69. Lefebre N, Brehaut JA. Understanding
  70. Audit and Feedback to Support Falls
  71. Prevention and Pain Management in
  72. Home Health Care. Home Health Care
  73. Manag Pract. 2015;28(2):79–85.
  74. Christina V, Baldwin K, Biron A, Emed J,
  75. Lepage K. Factors Influencing the
  76. effectiveness of audit and feedback:
  77. nurses’ perceptions. J Nurs Mangement.
  78. ;24(8).
  79. Wong X, Tung YJ, Peck SY, Goh ML.
  80. Clinical nursing handovers for continuity
  81. of safe patient care in adult surgical
  82. wards: A best practice implementation
  83. project. JBI Database Syst Rev Implement
  84. Reports. 2019;17(5):1003–15.
  85. Marquis BL, Huston CJ. Leadership Role
  86. and Management Functions in Nursing.
  87. United State: Williams & Wilkins; 2015.
  88. Gao H, Niu H, Shi J. Implementation of
  89. criteria-based audit to reduce patient’s
  90. burdens and improve efficiency in
  91. hospital management. Eur J Inflamm.
  92. ;17:205873921982824.
  93. Poortaghi S, Salsali M, Ebadi A,
  94. Rahnavard Z, Maleki F. Findings From a
  95. Nursing Care Audit Based on the Nursing
  96. Process: A Descriptive Study. Nurs
  97. Midwifery Stud. 2015;4(3):0–5.
  98. Nyide SP, Brysiewicz P, Bruce J, Clarke
  99. DL. A retrospective audit of nursingrelated morbidity recorded in a state
  100. hospital in KwaZulu-Natal. Curationis.
  101. ;42(1):1 –5.
  102. Gaughan K, Casey S, Finan A. A
  103. Prospective Audit Of Attendances At a
  104. Regional General Emergency
  105. Departement and Paediatric Assessment
  106. Unit. 2019;104(Suppl 3):2019. Available
  107. from:
  108. https://adc.bmj.com/content/archdischild/
  109. /Suppl_3/A68.2.full.pdf
  110. Gill FJ, Lin F, Massey D, Wilson L,
  111. Greenwood M, Skylas K, et al.
  112. Development of a position statement for
  113. Australian critical care nurse education.
  114. Aust Crit Care [Internet].
  115. ;32(4):346–50. Available from:
  116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2018.08.00