Kepuasan Perawat Dalam Penggunaan Website Skrining Disfagia

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abdul Bari Setiawan
Agianto
Herry Setiawan

Abstract

The lack of interest of nurses to used screening instruments for dysphagia at stroke centers and nerve spaces was
a strong reason for the development of the dysphagia screening website. This was to facilitate nurses in screening
patients with dysphagia quickly. This study aimd to see the level of nurse satisfaction on the performance of
dysphagia screening websites. Quantitative research was used with total sampling techniques to 25 nurses. It
was conducted on July to August 2019. Data collection used a nurse satisfaction level questionnaire after using
the dysphagia screening website with results 8.0% were quite satisfied, 68.0% were satisfied and 24.0% were
very satisfied for the dysphagia screening website. As many as 88.0% chose dysphagia screening websites to
screen for stroke patients, 8.0% chose others that wanted this website to be developed into an offline application
so that it could be used at any time and 4.0% chose to continue to screen for dysphagia by manual or check list
on paper. Most respondent expressed the satisfaction in using dysphagia screening websites as seen from the
level of satisfaction obtained.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
1.
Setiawan AB, Agianto, Setiawan H. Kepuasan Perawat Dalam Penggunaan Website Skrining Disfagia. jdk [Internet]. 2023 Mar. 14 [cited 2026 Sep. 30];9(1):9-15. Available from: https://jdk.ulm.ac.id/index.php/jdk/article/view/309

References

  1. Misbach, J. 2007. Pandangan Umum
  2. Mengenai Stroke. Balai penerbit UI.
  3. Jakarta.
  4. Junaidi, Iskandar., 2011. Stroke Waspadai
  5. Ancamannya. Yogyakarta : ANDI.
  6. Rikesdas. 2013. Badan Penelitian dan
  7. Pengembangan Kesehatan KEMENKES
  8. RI 2013. Prevalensi Penyakit Jantung
  9. Koroner , Ggal Jantung, dan Stroke Pada
  10. Umur > 15 Tahun Menurut Provinsi.
  11. Indonesia 2013 (92).pdf.
  12. Sura, L., Madhayani, A., Carnaby, G.,
  13. Crary. MA. Dysphagia in the elderly:
  14. management and nutritional
  15. considerations. Clinical Interventions in
  16. Aging. 2012;7: 287–98
  17. Rini. 2009. Teknologi Informasi Dan
  18. Komunikasi. Bandung: Erlangga.
  19. Kozier, B., 2008. Fundamental Of
  20. Nursing. EGC
  21. Rismayadi, B. 2015. “Fakor-faktor yang
  22. Mempengaruhi Produktivitas Kerja
  23. Karyawan (Studi Kasus pada CV Mitra
  24. Bersama Lestari Tahun 2014),” Jurnal
  25. Manajemen dan Bisnis. 1(1), hal. 1 -16.
  26. Rolinson, d. 2001. Care Concepts in
  27. Advanced Practice Nursing. St Louis
  28. Mosby A: Harcourt Health Sciences
  29. Company.
  30. Siagian, S. P. 2000. Teori Pengembangan
  31. Organisasi. Jakarta: penerbit Bumi
  32. Askara.
  33. Royani. 2010. “Hubungan Sistem
  34. Penghargaan Dengan Kinerj Perawat
  35. DalamMelaksanakan Asuhan
  36. Keperawatan Di Rumah Sakit Umum
  37. Daerah Cilegon Banten,” Unibersitas
  38. Indonesia, Hal 29-46.
  39. Gui, anderes., Erwin., Amanda N. V et al.
  40. Tingkat Kepuasan Pengguna
  41. Aplikasi IBS pada PT. Citrajaya Infinite
  42. System. CommIT, Vol 3 no. 1 hl,. 53-58.
  43. Remih. 2011., Mempelajari Website Web.
  44. Jakarta: Informatika.
  45. Bulechek, Butcher, Dochterman, Wagner.
  46. Nursing InterventionsClassification
  47. (NIC), sixth edition. United Satates of
  48. America: Elsevier.
  49. Dunia Keperawatan, Volume 9, Nomor 1 , 2021 : 9-15
  50. Courtney BA, Flier LA. RN dysphagia
  51. screening, a stepwise approach. J Neurosci
  52. Nurs. 2009;41(1):28-38.
  53. Fathanah., 2015. Basis Data (Revisi
  54. Kedua). Bandung: Penerbit Informatika
  55. Bekti, Humaira’Bintu. 2015. Mahir
  56. Membuat Website dengan Adobe
  57. Dreamweaver CS6, CSS, dan JQuery.
  58. Yogyakarta: ANDI.
  59. Agianto & Setiawan. H. 2018.
  60. Pengembangan Skrining Disfagia. Versi
  61. Smartphone, (Belum Dipublikasi)
  62. Rahmadi, Moch Luthfi. 2013. Tips
  63. Membuat Website tanpa Coding dan
  64. Langsung Online. Yogyakarta: ANDI.