Pengaruh Pendidikan Kesehatan Dengan Metode Buzz Group Terhadap Perilaku Ibu Tentang Pencegahan Pneumonia Pada Balita

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Mar 14, 2023
Download
pdf
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Vol. 9 No. 1 (2021): Dunia Keperawatan: Jurnal Keperawatan dan Kesehatan

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Lindesi Yanti
Rizanda Mahchmud
Lili Fajriah

Abstract

Pneumonia is the second leading cause ofdeath after diarrhea in Indonesia. Health education is an effort to
increase knowledge, attitudes, and actions in the prevention ofpneumonia. Buzz group one method ofhealth
education can stimulate the active role ofmothers in expressing opinions about pneumonia prevention. The
purpose ofthe study was to determine the effect ofbuzz group health education on maternal behavior. This
type of quantitative research with Non-Equivalent Control Group design. The number of samples was 76
people, with the technique ofSimple Random Sampling. The Independent Samples T-test shows differences
in knowledge, attitudes, and actions in the intervention and control groups. The MANOVA test showed that
the buzz group method was most influential in increasing knowledge, attitudes, and actions (p <α = 0.05).
Conclusion The Health education method of the buzz group is more effective in increasing knowledge,
attitudes, and actions of mothers regarding the prevention of pneumonia in infants compared to lecture
methods. Suggestions for Puskesmas to conduct health education using the buzz group method as an effective
method as a promotional and preventive effort.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
1.
Yanti L, Mahchmud R, Fajriah L. Pengaruh Pendidikan Kesehatan Dengan Metode Buzz Group Terhadap Perilaku Ibu Tentang Pencegahan Pneumonia Pada Balita. jdk [Internet]. 2023 Mar. 14 [cited 2026 Oct. 1];9(1):1-8. Available from: https://jdk.ulm.ac.id/index.php/jdk/article/view/308

References

  1. World Health Organization. Pneumonia.
  2. ; Available from:
  3. https://www.who.int/news-room/factsheets/detail/pneumonia
  4. Efni Y, Machmud R, Pertiwi D. Artikel
  5. Penelitian Faktor Risiko yang
  6. Berhubungan dengan Kejadian
  7. Pneumonia pada Balita di Kelurahan Air
  8. Tawar Barat Padang. Jurnal Kesehatan
  9. Andalas 2016;5(2):365–70.
  10. http://doi.org/10.25077/jka.v5i2.523
  11. World Health Organization. Pneumonia.
  12. Available from:
  13. http://www.who.int/newsroom/factsheet/detail/pneumonia
  14. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik
  15. Indonesia. Data dan Informasi Profil
  16. Kesehatan Indonesia 2017. Jakarta; 2018.
  17. Kementerian Kesehatan RI. Data dan
  18. Informasi Kesehatan Indonesia: 2018.
  19. Dinkes. Profil Kesehatan Tahun 2017.
  20. Palembang; 2018.
  21. Rizqa Wahyu handayani. Beberapa Faktor
  22. Resiko Kejadian Pneumonia Pada Balita.
  23. Artikel Penelitian Universitas
  24. Diponegoro. 2016;
  25. Puspitasari N, Fitriahadi E. Pengetahuan
  26. ibu tentang pneumonia pada balita
  27. mengalami peningkatan setelah diberikan
  28. penyuluhan. J Heal Stud. 2018;3 No.
  29. :56–65.
  30. Https://doi.org/10.31101/jhes.495
  31. Situmeang L. Pengaruh Pelatihan Infeksi
  32. Saluran Pernafasan Akut (Ispa) Terhadap
  33. Pengetahuan Dan Sikap Ibu Dalam
  34. Pencegahan Dan Perawatan Balita
  35. Pengidap Ispa Di Puskesmas Kotaraja
  36. Jayapura Papua. 2017;
  37. Soekidjo Notoatmodjo. Promosi
  38. Kesehatan Teori Dan Aplikasi. Jakarta:
  39. Rineka Cipta; 2010.
  40. Ulfah Nuristia. Efektivitas Metode Buzz
  41. Group Discussion Untuk Meningkatkan.
  42. Unnes J Public Healt. 2014;3(1):1 –7.
  43. Https://doi.org/10.15294/ujph.v3i1.316
  44. Winancy, Ardini S. Raksanagara Yf.
  45. Perbandingan Penerapan Metode
  46. Brainstorming Dan Buzz Group
  47. Terhadap Peningkatan Pengetahuan
  48. Suami Ibu Hamil. Southeast Asian J
  49. Midwifery Vol. 2015;1(1):1 –9.
  50. DOI: 10.36749/seajom.v1i1.51
  51. Arivananthan. M. Knowledge exchange
  52. toolbox. New York, NY: UNICEF;
  53. Maulana H. Promosi Kesehatan. Jakarta:
  54. EGC; 2013.
  55. Ikromah JN, Asmaningrum N,
  56. Sulistiyorini L. Perbedaan Metode Buzz
  57. Group Discussion dengan Ceramah
  58. Audiovisual terhadap Tingkat
  59. Pendidikan Warga Binaan tentang HIV /
  60. AIDS di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Klas
  61. IIA Kabupaten Jember ( The Differences
  62. between Using Buzz Group Discussion
  63. Method and Audiovisual Lectures to the
  64. Knowledge Level of Inmates.
  65. ;3(1):82–8.
  66. Http://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/JPK/a
  67. rticle/view/2429>
  68. Alligood MR. Nursing Theorists and
  69. Their Work [Internet]. USA: Mosby
  70. Elsevier; 2014. Available from:
  71. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.
  72. /conu.2007.24.1.106a
  73. Green LW. Health Promotion Planning
  74. an Education and Enviromental
  75. Approach. In New York: Mayfield;
  76. Yanti L, Mahchmud R, Fajriah L. Pengaruh Pendidikan Kesehatan Dengan Metode Buzz Group,
  77. Supliyani E. Diskusi Buzz Group
  78. Kaitannya Dengan Pengetahuan Dan
  79. Sikap. 2019;2167(2):13–23.
  80. Pender NJ et al. Health Promotion In
  81. Nursing Practice. In: Pearson, editor. 6
  82. th editi. Boston; 2011.
  83. Suliha U. Pendidikan Kesehatan dalam
  84. Keperawatan. Jakarta: EGC; 2002.
  85. Nababan S, Agushybana F, Suryoputro A.
  86. Efektifitas Ceramah Booklet dan Buzz
  87. Group dalam Upaya Pencegahan
  88. Pneumonia pada Anak. Promosi
  89. Kesehat Indones. 2019;14(1)
  90. Doi:10.14710/jpki.14.1.29-39
  91. .
  92. Mubarak IW. Promosi Kesehatan :
  93. Sebuah Pengantar Proses Belajar
  94. Mengajar dalam Pendidikan.
  95. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu; 2007.
  96. Soekidjo Notoatmodjo. Metodelogi
  97. Penelitian Kesehatan. Jakarta: Rineka
  98. Cipta; 2012.
  99. Azwar S. Sikap Manusia Teori dan
  100. Pengukuran. In: 2edn. Yogyakarta: EGC;
  101. Sunaryo. Psikologi untuk Keperawatan.
  102. Jakarta: EGC; 2004.