Pengetahuan SALT Triage Bisa Diperoleh Melalui Menonton Video Simulasi

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Nov 30, 2021
Download
pdf
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Vol. 9 No. 3 (2021): Jurnal Dunia Keperawatan

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Hieronimus Amandus
Rima Rianti
Suratno
Doni Al Ifhan

Abstract

Background : Digital technology in the learning process is no longer a foreign object now. The existence of
hardware such as phones, computers, tablets, iPads and the like which are supported by the rapid
development of the internet makes all information and communication more effective and efficient. The use
of technology is expected to synergize and support conventional work. This study seeks answers about
alternative learning models that can be used by nurses in increasing their knowledge of the triage mass
casuality accidents in situations of lack of education and training that they get directly.
Purposes : This study aims to determine the effect of watching SALT Triage simulation videos before and
after the intervention is carried out to increase the knowledge of emergency nurses in conducting SALT
Triage simulations.
Methods : This type of research is a nonequivalent control group design. Samples were taken using a
purposive sampling technique with a large sample of 32 respondents divided into 2 groups. Data analysis
using paired t test.
Result : There was an effect of watching SALT Triage simulation videos on increasing nurses' knowledge
before and after the intervention with the results of p <0.05.
Conclusion : Watching SALT Triage simulation videos is one method that can be used to increase nurses'
knowledge of triage dealing with victims of mass traffic accidents

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
1.
Amandus H, Rianti R, Suratno, Ifhan DA. Pengetahuan SALT Triage Bisa Diperoleh Melalui Menonton Video Simulasi. jdk [Internet]. 2021 Nov. 30 [cited 2024 May 9];9(3):349-54. Available from: https://jdk.ulm.ac.id/index.php/jdk/article/view/271

References

  1. WHO. Global Status Report On Road
  2. Safety 2018. 2018.
  3. Debacker M, Van Utterbeeck F,
  4. Ullrich C, Dhondt E, Hubloue I.
  5. SIMEDIS: a Discrete-Event
  6. Simulation Model for Testing
  7. Responses to Mass Casualty
  8. Incidents. J Med Syst [Internet].
  9. ;40(12). Available from:
  10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10916-
  11. -0633-z
  12. Lee CH. Disaster and Mass Casualty
  13. Triage. Virtual Mentor [Internet].
  14. ;12(6):466. Available from:
  15. http://virtualmentor.amaassn.org/2010/06/cprl1-1006.html
  16. Zachariasse JM, Van Der Lee D,
  17. Seiger N, De Vos-Kerkhof E,
  18. Oostenbrink R, Moll HA. The role of
  19. nurses’ clinical impression in the first
  20. assessment of children at the
  21. emergency department. Arch Dis
  22. Child. 2017;102(11):1052–6.
  23. Kerie S, Tilahun A, Mandesh A.Triage skill and associated factors
  24. among emergency nurses in Addis
  25. Ababa, Ethiopia 2017: A crosssectional study. BMC Res Notes
  26. [Internet]. 2018;11(1):1–7. Available
  27. from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-
  28. -3769-8
  29. Miniard JL, Ballman K. Nurse
  30. Practitioner Triage of the
  31. Neurosurgical Patient : A Patient
  32. Centered Care Delivery Model. J
  33. Neurosci Nurs. 2018;50:244–6.
  34. Eijk ES V, Bettink-Remeijer MW,
  35. Timman R, Busschbach JJ V. From
  36. pen-and-paper questionnaire to a
  37. computer-assisted instrument for selftriage in the ophthalmic emergency
  38. department: Process and validation.
  39. Comput Biol Med [Internet].
  40. ;66:258–62. Available from:
  41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiom
  42. ed.2015.09.014
  43. Nicely S, Farra S. Fostering learning
  44. through Interprofessional Virtual
  45. Reality Simulation Development. J
  46. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2015;36:335–6.
  47. Kushayati N. Analisis Metode Triage
  48. Prehospital pada Insiden Korban
  49. Masal (Mass Casualty Incident). Vol.
  50. 2014.
  51. Lerner EB, Schwartz RB, Coule PL,
  52. Pirrallo RG. Use of SALT triage in a
  53. simulated mass-casualty incident.
  54. Prehospital Emerg Care.
  55. ;14(1):21–5.
  56. Barratt J. A focus group study of the
  57. use of video-recorded simulated
  58. objective structured clinical
  59. examinations in nurse practitioner
  60. education. Nurse Educ Pract
  61. [Internet]. 2010;10(3):170–5.
  62. Available from:
  63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2009.
  64. 004
  65. Björn A, Pudas-Tähkä SM, Salanterä
  66. S, Axelin A. Video education for
  67. critical care nurses to assess pain with
  68. a behavioural pain assessment tool: A
  69. descriptive comparative study.
  70. Intensive Crit Care Nurs [Internet].
  71. ;42:68–74. Available from:
  72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2017.
  73. 010
  74. Park HJ, Byun MK, Kwon JW, Kim
  75. WK, Nahm DH, Lee MG, et al. Video
  76. education versus face-to-face
  77. education on inhaler technique for
  78. patients with well-controlled or
  79. partly-controlled asthma: A phase IV,
  80. open-label, non-inferiority,
  81. multicenter, randomized, controlled
  82. trial. PLoS One [Internet].
  83. ;13(8):1–16. Available from:
  84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pon
  85. e.0197358
  86. Ostovar S, Allahbakhshian A,
  87. Gholizadeh L, Dizaji SL, Sarbakhsh
  88. P, Ghahramanian A. Comparison of
  89. the effects of debriefing methods on
  90. psychomotor skills, self‑confidence,
  91. and satisfaction in novice nursing
  92. students: A quasi‑experimental study.
  93. J Adv Pharm Technol Res.
  94. ;8(2):46–51.
  95. Grant JS, Dawkins D, Molhook L,
  96. Keltner NL, Vance DE. Comparing
  97. the effectiveness of video-assisted
  98. oral debriefing and oral debriefing
  99. alone on behaviors by undergraduate
  100. nursing students during high-fidelity
  101. simulation. Nurse Educ Pract
  102. [Internet]. 2014;14(5):479–84.
  103. Available from:
  104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2014.
  105. 003