Analysis of Infrastructure for Covid-19 Patient Satisfaction at RSDI Banjarbaru City

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Rahimul Yakin
Ichsan Rizany
Robiatul Adawiyah
M.Khairul Fikri
Azhar

Abstract

Patient satisfaction is a condition of fulfilling the wishes, expectations and needs of patients. Bases on data
from March 2020 to March 2021, there was an increase in patients returning home at their own request by
3% and the lack of fulfillement of patient satisfaction values which were still below 90%. The aim of this
study is to evaluate Infrastructure and compliance of covid-19 patients. The study desing used was cross
sectional, whit a consecutive sampling and a sample size of 120 covid-19 patients. Data were analyzed using
the spearman rank rest. Data collection was carried out from June 2021 to August 2021. The result of the
study found that there was a relationship between phycsical facility and satisfaction with p value 0,001 and r
0,498. The better infrastructure provide, the higher pastient satisfaction

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
1.
Yakin R, Rizany I, Adawiyah R, Fikri M, Azhar. Analysis of Infrastructure for Covid-19 Patient Satisfaction at RSDI Banjarbaru City. jdk [Internet]. 2023 Mar. 9 [cited 2024 Apr. 28];9(3):326-33. Available from: https://jdk.ulm.ac.id/index.php/jdk/article/view/268

References

  1. Who. Coronavirus disease (covid-
  2. situation dashoard [Internet].
  3. [cited 2021 Mar 31].
  4. Available from:
  5. http://experience.arcgis.com/exper
  6. ience/685d0ace52164818abeeeee
  7. b9125cd
  8. Adhikari SP, Meng S, Wu Y-J,
  9. Mao Y-P, Ye R-X, Wang Q-Z, et
  10. al. Epidemiology, causes, clinical
  11. manifestation and diagnosis,
  12. prevention and control of
  13. coronavirus disease (COVID-19)
  14. during the early outbreak period: a
  15. scoping review. Infect Dis Poverty
  16. [Internet]. 2020;9(1):29. Available
  17. from:
  18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-
  19. -00646-x
  20. Kementrian Kesehatan Republik
  21. Indonesia. Kementrian Kesehatan
  22. Republik Indonesia. Info Infeksi
  23. Emerging Kementrian Kesehatan
  24. RI [Internet]. Kementerian
  25. Kesehatan RI. 2020 [cited 2020
  26. Mar 31]. Available from:
  27. http://covid19.kemkes.go.id
  28. Horton R. Offline: COVID-19 and
  29. the NHS—“a national scandal.”
  30. Lancet [Internet]. 2020
  31. Mar;395(10229):1022. Available
  32. from:
  33. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/ret
  34. rieve/pii/S0140673620307273
  35. Wu JT, Leung K, Leung GM.
  36. Nowcasting and forecasting the
  37. potential domestic and
  38. international spread of the 2019-
  39. nCoV outbreak originating in
  40. Wuhan, China: a modelling study.
  41. Lancet [Internet]. 2020
  42. Feb;395(10225):689–97.
  43. Available from:
  44. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/ret
  45. rieve/pii/S0140673620302609
  46. Phua J, Faruq MO, Kulkarni AP,
  47. Redjeki IS, Detleuxay K,
  48. Mendsaikhan N, et al. Critical
  49. Care Bed Capacity in Asian
  50. Countries and Regions. Crit Care
  51. Med [Internet]. 2020
  52. May;48(5):654–62. Available
  53. from:
  54. http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/
  55. CCM.0000000000004222
  56. Luxon L. Infrastructure - the key to
  57. healthcare improvement. Futur
  58. Hosp J [Internet]. 2015
  59. Feb;2(1):4–7. Available from:
  60. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub
  61. med/31098066
  62. Indonesia KKR. Keputusan
  63. Menteri Kesehatan Republik
  64. Indonesia Nomor :
  65. /Menkes/SK/II/2008 Tentang
  66. Standar Pelayanan Minimal
  67. Rumah Sakit. Indonesia; 2008.
  68. Saprilla AN. Pengaruh
  69. Responsiveness Perawat Dalam
  70. Praktik Komunikasi Terapeutik
  71. Terhadap Kepuasan Pasien
  72. Instalasi Rawat Inap Rsu HajiSurabaya. J Adm Kesehat Indones.
  73. ;6(2):173–9.
  74. Afrinah RT. Pengaruh Sarana
  75. Prasarana Dan Kualitas Pelayanan
  76. Terhadap Kepuasan Pasien (Studi
  77. Pada Pasien Rawat Jalan Unit
  78. Poliklinik Ipdn Jatinangor). 2021;
  79. Calisir F, Gumussoy CA,
  80. Bayraktaroglu AE, Kaya B.
  81. Effects of service quality
  82. dimensions on customer
  83. satisfaction and return intention in
  84. different hospital types. In:
  85. Proceedings of the 2012
  86. International Conference on
  87. Industrial Engineering and
  88. Operations Management. 2012. p.
  89. –22.
  90. Nyorong M, Hamzah A, Mukti
  91. WY. Pengaruh Mutu Layanan
  92. Kesehatan terhadap Kepuasan
  93. Pasien Rawat Inap di Rumah Sakit
  94. Woodward Kota Palu. J Adm dan
  95. Kebijak Kesehat Indones.
  96. ;2(03).
  97. Nugraha KSW, Suryaningsih IB,
  98. Paramita C. Pengaruh ElemenElemen Healthcare Service
  99. Quality (HCSQ) Terhadap
  100. Kepuasan Pasien Rumah Sakit
  101. Bina Sehat Jember. BISMA J
  102. Bisnis dan Manaj.
  103. ;12(3):323–40.
  104. Julaika S, Rachman MM.
  105. Pengaruh Fasilitas, Layanan
  106. Perawat Terhadap Kepuasan
  107. Pasien Rawat Inap Rumah Sakit
  108. Al-Islam HM Mawardi Krian Di
  109. Sidoarjo. J Sustain Bussiness Res.
  110. ;2(2):241–9.
  111. Hussain A, Asif M, Jameel A,
  112. Hwang J, Sahito N, Kanwel S.
  113. Promoting OPD Patient
  114. Satisfaction through Different
  115. Healthcare Determinants: A Study
  116. of Public Sector Hospitals. Int J
  117. Environ Res Public Health
  118. [Internet]. 2019 Oct
  119. ;16(19):3719. Available from:
  120. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-
  121. /16/19/3719